The PFOS scandal is the largest environmental scandal in recent Flemish history. Environmental pollution is often approached from an environmental law perspective: to what extent is PFOS pollution in conflict with Flemish environmental law regulations (emission standards, permit requirements, etc.), and who is responsible for this? […]
HUMAN RIGHTS LEAGUE: The PFOS scandal through a human rights lens Read More »
The contractors of the Oosterweel works were summoned because they allegedly handled the contaminated soil carelessly. The court sees (for the time being) no reason to intervene. 18.12.2021 | DS Read the full article in the newspaper… “We will find out in any case whether
DS: No stricter measures yet for dealing with PFOS at Oosterweel site Read More »
Owners, buyers and tenants must be informed about the (potential) presence of PFAS, according to Jonas Vernimmen and Dries Verhaeghe. 08.12.2021 | DS Read the full article in the newspaper… The Flemish government likes to flex its muscles against 3M, but
DS: Protect buyers from 'forever chemicals' forever Read More »
Why is the Flemish Government allowing gigantic infrastructure works to be carried out in one of the largest PFAS hotspots in the world? The Flemish research committee PFAS-PFOS has collected several crucial pieces of the puzzle over the past six months. Enough to put the politicians involved firmly on the grill
apache: Time for answers: why was politics silent about PFAS pollution? Read More »
The amount of PFAS in flatfish (flounder) in the eastern part of the Western Scheldt is more than 800 times higher than the standard for fish used by the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. This is evident from an indicative study by Professor
apache: Fish in Western Scheldt is chock full of PFAS Read More »
In 2018, the waste company Ovam had reservations about the way in which the contaminated soil would be handled at the Oosterweel site. 'Given the economic consequences of delays', they agreed anyway. 27.11.2021 | DS Read the full article in the
DS: 'The pressure to make Oosterweel move forward was enormous' Read More »
75,000 euros, that was the amount that was agreed between chemical factory 3M and Lantis, the consortium that would build Oosterweel. The two reached a settlement and that money had to ensure that Lantis would place the most polluted soil in a safety berm
HLN: “Environmental inspection blows up settlement between 3M and Lantis” Read More »
The first hearing of the lawsuit against Oosterweel developer Lantis took place at the court in Antwerp on Thursday. Greenpeace, citizen initiative Grondrecht and activist Thomas Goorden demand that Lantis and contractor Rinkonien take more measures when processing PFOS-containing
GVA: Action groups demand penalty from Lantis for careless management of PFOS soil Read More »
Environmental activist Thomas Goorden is convinced that the lawsuit he filed together with Greenpeace and Grondrecht against Lantis is admissible. He said this on Thursday before the start of the case in Antwerp. 'I am curious to see what leaps Lantis will make
Knack: PFOS pollution: 'Confidence that we have an admissible case' (Thomas Goorden) Read More »
Today, the first hearing in the court of first instance will start regarding the environmental strike procedure that six civil parties and Greenpeace are initiating against Lantis. They are requesting precautionary measures against the PFOS-contaminated soil at the Oosterweel works. Environmental activist Thomas 'De Kat' Goorden was already cautious before the hearing
English 
Nederlands (België)